Podium 1 - Shoulder Arthroplasty (3+3')

09:05 • 916 • The Relationship between Native Glenoid Size and Outcomes with Various Baseplate and Glenosphere Sizes after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty > B. Bradley Schoch (Jacksonville, Fl) 09:11 • 534 • Routine face to face follow-up for shoulder arthroplasty – necessity or just a costly safety net? > A. Adrian Andronic (Coventry, Uk) 09:17 • 434 • Implantation-specific features of a new metaphyseally anchored and convertible short stem system > P. Philipp Vetter (Zurich) 09:23 • 519 • Can Surgeons Predict How Much Compensation is Needed to Correct Glenoid Inclination in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty? > M. Mark Mouchantaf (Haguenau) 09:29 • 459 • Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: How to reach the back? A motion capture study to analyse glenohumeral strategies to perform functional internal rotation after RSA and in control cases > G. Gabriel Levy (Meyrin) 09:35 • 572 • The Relationship Between Acromial Morphology and Eccentric Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Three-Dimensional Analysis > B. Benjamin Zmistowski (Chesterfield) 09:41 • 659 • Benefits and pitfalls of BIO-RSA implants in shoulder arthroplasty for patients with Walch deformities: a finite element study > V. Victor Housset (Paris) 09:47 • 13 • Functional impact and risk factors for humeral implant migration in stemless RSA > M. Maxime Antoni (Strasbourg) 09:53 • 158 • A randomised controlled trial of Lesser Tuberosity Footprint-based vs Near Anatomical Muscle-based subscapularis refixation with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for complex proximal humerus fractures > P. Peter Domos (London) 09:59 • 529 • “ByDesign” or “ByTechnique”: Do surgeons truly control the lateralization and distalization of RSA? A comparative study of four different implants > M-O. Marc-Olivier Gauci (Nice)